Memo to Members

Proposed HUD Rules Would Jeopardize Housing Assistance; Comment Periods Ending Soon - Take Action!

Apr 13, 2026

By NLIHC Policy Team 

Since February, HUD has published several proposed regulatory changes that would have harmful impacts on HUD tenants. Each of these proposals is currently open for public comment, with comment periods ending over the next few weeks: 

  • HUD’s proposed mixed-status rule, which would require families with mixed immigration statuses (mixed-status families) in certain HUD programs to choose between remaining together and losing their housing assistance; 

  • HUD’s proposal to repeal the requirement that PHAs and project-based rental assistance (PBRA) owners provide households with at least a 30-day termination notice prior to filing an eviction action for nonpayment of rent (30-Day Notice Proposal); and  

  • HUD’s proposed rule that would allow public housing agencies (PHAs) and HUD-assisted owners to adopt work requirements and time limits on assistance. 

Mixed-Status Proposed Rule – Comment Deadline April 21 

HUD has published proposed changes that would require families with mixed immigration statuses (mixed-status families) in certain HUD programs to choose between remaining together and losing their housing. In 2025, the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities (CBPP) estimated that nearly 80,000 people, including 37,000 children, could lose their rental assistance if such changes are enacted.  

NLIHC supports the National Housing Law Project (NHLP) and Protecting Immigrant Families (PIF) Coalition’s Keep Families Together campaign to mobilize opposition to the proposal and urges advocates to submit comments opposing the rule by April 21 at 11:59 pm ET!  

NLIHC has joined an organizational sign-on comment letter from PIF and urges housing organizations to cosign in support of housing for immigrant families by April 20 at 5:00 pm ET! 

Take action on the Mixed-Status Proposed Rule: 

  1. Submit your own comment letter urging HUD to withdraw the proposed rule. Comments are due April 21 at 11:59 pm ET!  

  2. Organizations can use this comment template, tailored to your unique perspective, to elaborate on the harms of the proposal. 

  3. Individuals, including housing advocates and tenant unions, can use prompts from the Keep Families Together webpage. 

  4. Join PIF’s organizational sign-on comment letter by April 20 at 5:00 pm ET! 

  5. Host your own comment party or share the proposal in your regular meetings! NLIHC staff are ready and available to help advocates learn more about the proposal and support your comments. Reach out to [email protected] to learn more! 

30-Day Notice Proposal – Comment Deadline April 27 

In February 2026, HUD issued “Revocation of the 30-Day Notification Requirement Prior to Termination of Lease for Nonpayment of Rent.” If these changes are finalized, certain tenants in HUD-assisted housing would have less time to catch up on rent to avoid eviction. HUD would also no longer require PHAs and PBRA owners to provide information such as itemized lists of rent owed. HUD’s proposal would remove additional HUD protections, such as a prohibition on evicting tenants for nonpayment if they caught up on rent during the 30-day notice period.  

Although HUD recently announced it has postponed when these changes would go into effect, the rulemaking is still moving forward. Comments opposing this proposal are crucial. 

Take action on the 30-Day Notice Proposal by: 

  1. Submitting your own comment, urging HUD to withdraw the proposed rule. The comment deadline is April 27 at 11:59 pm ET. NHLP has created templates for tenants and organizations. Please reach out to Hannah Adams, [email protected], for more information. 

  2. Learning more about how this proposal will harm HUD tenants. NLIHC staff are ready and available to help advocates learn more about the proposal and support your comments. Reach out to [email protected] to learn more! 

Work Requirements and Time Limits Proposed Rule – Comment Deadline May 1 

On March 2, HUD proposed allowing public housing agencies (PHAs) and HUD-assisted owners to impose work requirements and time limits on assisted families. A recent CBPP analysis found that a two-year time limit on assistance would result in an estimated 3.3 million people losing their rental assistance, including 1.7 million children.   

HUD’s Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM), “Establishing Flexibility for Implementation of Work Requirements and Term Limits,” would allow “well-performing” PHAs and PBRA owners to adopt work requirements for “work-eligible” adults of up to 40 hours per week. “Work-eligible” adults are defined in the NPRM as individuals ages 18 to 61 who are not people with disabilities, pregnant, or enrolled in higher education. The “work-eligible” definition also excludes primary caretakers for: a person with a disability, a child under six, or a person who is temporarily incapacitated.   

The NPRM would also allow for time limits on assistance after two years for “non-elderly, non-disabled families.” The definitions of “elderly family” and “disabled family” in current HUD regulations are written in a way that, under HUD’s proposal, individual household members who are elderly or who have disabilities could be impacted by a time limit if the household itself is considered “non-elderly” and “non-disabled.” 

The NPRM would apply to the following programs: public housing, Housing Choice Vouchers (HCV), Project-Based Vouchers (PBV), and PBRA. 

Take action on the Work Requirements and Time Limits Proposed Rule by: 

Related Content