Housing Cost Burden by Income Group
Affordable and Available Homes per 100 Renter Households
All Gap Data for California
California | Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim, CA (Metro) | Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA (Metro) | Sacramento-Roseville-Folsom, CA | San Diego-Chula Vista-Carlsbad, CA | San Francisco-Oakland-Berkeley, CA | San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara, CA (Metro) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Extremely Low Income Households and Available Rentals |
|||||||
Extremely Low Income Renter Households | 1,308,328 | 490,524 | 99,377 | 85,002 | 102,268 | 186,875 | 62,873 |
Affordable and Available Rental Homes | 309,818 | 98,368 | 20,293 | 22,702 | 19,375 | 62,786 | 18,780 |
Surplus (Deficit) of Affordable and Available Rental Units |
|||||||
At or below EXTREMELY LOW INCOME | -998,510 | -392,156 | -79,084 | -62,300 | -82,893 | -124,089 | -44,093 |
At or below 50% AMI | -1,450,924 | -627,606 | -113,707 | -80,954 | -132,524 | -155,017 | -54,630 |
Affordable and Available Rental Units per 100 Households at or below Threshold |
|||||||
At or below Extremely Low Income | 24 | 20 | 20 | 27 | 19 | 34 | 30 |
At or below 50% AMI | 32 | 24 | 33 | 40 | 24 | 46 | 46 |
At or below 80% AMI | 66 | 53 | 65 | 81 | 61 | 82 | 90 |
At or below 100% AMI | 85 | 76 | 84 | 96 | 85 | 95 | 102 |
% of Renter Households with Cost Burden |
|||||||
At Extremely Low Income | 89 | 90 | 88 | 87 | 91 | 85 | 85 |
Extremely Low Income to 50% AMI | 85 | 88 | 85 | 84 | 90 | 78 | 75 |
51% to 80% AMI | 64 | 70 | 65 | 59 | 73 | 57 | 48 |
81 to 100% AMI | 39 | 45 | 44 | 27 | 44 | 30 | 29 |
% of Renter Households with Severe Cost Burden |
|||||||
At Extremely Low Income | 78 | 82 | 81 | 77 | 83 | 69 | 69 |
ELI to 50% AMI | 51 | 59 | 52 | 44 | 64 | 42 | 31 |
51% to 80% AMI | 16 | 23 | 18 | 7 | 19 | 10 | 7 |
81 to 100% AMI | 5 | 8 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 |